Online Grievance Redress Facility

Functioning of Courts :
# are the courts serving for public or Advocates?
Both the courts and counsels are being paid by the public but there are mutual adjustments among the courts & counsels, punishing the public for knocking the doors of justice!
Though there are n No. of rules/codes of procedures, nothing comes to rescue the public. The courts are helpless when it comes to take on with advocates for getting adjournments deliberately on flimsy grounds, even repeatedly! The advocates enjoy an unfettered rights over the courts and are equipped with all sorts of codes/procedures for circumventing the judicial process in conducting the court proceedings on their terms and thereby ultimately delaying the delivery of justice.
#This creates the sentiment, that courts are only for dragging on a matter and to deal with criminals and not for the right -loyal common man! who is left with two choices either to accept the cumbersome judicial system or succumb to the
pressure/inducements of the counsel's whims for out-of court settlements.
Why can't the court permit the party to make his/her submissions directly on such instances without mandatory revoking of the vakalat? Why should there be the hard-n-fast rule:- either by the advocate or by the party-in person? because whenever his advocate is busy or for simple statements of facts, the party can make direct submissions to the court. The advocates can argue the case as per the various rules /codes of the Law.
Even for obtaining a court document pertaining to his/her suit, the section offices generally not permitting the litigant to directly apply for the document without the counsel's knowledge.
On the other hand, when it comes to raise some basic grievance like deliberate/ continuous adjournments, recording his/her presence on the hearing day, etc. over the concerned court, there's no way the litigants can reach-out the judicial authority other than the standard route of TAPAL sec. - registry- Section office- concerned Court Officer.
And, it's of anybody's (general)Knowledge , that how the complainant / litigant is coerced by his/her Advocate , before the complaint itself reaches it's destination desk!